AI in Practice · Professional
What Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and Claude Code do, and what that means for the people who manage engineers
The current generation of coding agents differs structurally from the autocomplete-era tools that preceded them. This course explains what makes the difference, what the productivity evidence says, and what technical leaders need to know to manage teams that use them.
When you complete this course, you'll be able to:
Duration
~2.5 hours
Modules
3 modules
Level
professional
Format
Self-paced online
Audience
Technical leaders, engineering managers & anyone overseeing software teams
Access period
12 months
$199
Full course · One-time payment · 12 months access
Tax included · Price shown in your local currency at checkout.
Buy Course - $199Registration required to purchase.
Log in to access purchased courses.
What you'll learn
Modules in the Course
The structural difference between autocomplete-era tools and the current generation of coding agents: what they can do, how they do it, and what the model sees when it's working on your codebase.
The evidence on productivity gains, the new error patterns coding agents introduce, and the less-discussed effects on code review, institutional knowledge, and technical debt.
The decisions technical leaders need to make before their teams adopt coding agents: security posture, IP and licensing exposure, acceptable use policy, and how to frame the conversation with non-technical stakeholders.